Evaluating optical stabilization of the beating heart

TitleEvaluating optical stabilization of the beating heart
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2003
AuthorsGilhuly, T. J., S. E. Salcudean, and S. V. Lichtenstein
JournalEngineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine, IEEE
Volume22
Pagination133 - 140
Date Publishedjul.
ISSN0739-5175
Keywordsbeating heart, cardiology, coronary artery bypass grafting, ECG-triggered strobe light, Electrocardiography, error, human-factors testing, lighting, normal lighting conditions, objective measures, optical stabilization, placement of marks, regularly lit room tests, stillness illusion, strobed heart platform, subject performance, subjective measures, surgery, surgical procedure, surgical site, suturing, test time
Abstract

Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a surgical procedure performed to revascularize the areas of the heart deprived of oxygen by blockages. This procedure is relatively common. Improvement of this form of treatment is the topic of this article. An optical stabilization technique developed with the goal of enabling surgery on the beating heart is proposed and evaluated. The technique proposes that an ECG-triggered strobe light be focused on the surgical site making the heart appear still to the surgeon. The illusion of stillness then allows the surgeon to suture uninhibited by the actual motion. A test apparatus to model the heart was constructed and human-factors testing carried out to evaluate subject performance under conditions resembling those when suturing, with and without this strobe in place. In answer to the specific question of this research, "is strobing of a regular, beating heart beneficial to suturing as compared to suturing under normal lighting conditions?" the answer is "no". This was shown in both the objective and subjective measures. Whereas a strobed heart platform should have been less confusing to the subjects, easier to see, and thereby easier to mark, the opposite was seen. Time to perforrn the test was greater for the test of complicated motion with the strobe than without. Error increased as well. For both regularly lit room tests, subjects had better placement of marks as compared to when they did the same tests under optically stabilized conditions.

URLhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237514
DOI10.1109/MEMB.2003.1237514

a place of mind, The University of British Columbia

Electrical and Computer Engineering
2332 Main Mall
Vancouver, BC Canada V6T 1Z4
Tel +1.604.822.2872
Fax +1.604.822.5949
Email:

Emergency Procedures | Accessibility | Contact UBC | © Copyright 2021 The University of British Columbia